A Literary Prescription for
For starting again with a history rather than a blank sheet.
Dating at forty-five or sixty is not dating at twenty-five with more grey hair. You arrive carrying an ex, possibly children who have opinions, a house, a body that has done some living, and a fairly precise idea of what you are not doing again. So does everybody you meet. The apps are the same apps and they were built for other people. And underneath the logistics there is the genuinely exposing part: being looked at honestly by a stranger at an age when you had rather assumed that was finished, and discovering that you still want it. These books, poems and quotes are for all of that — dating after divorce, after bereavement, after years on your own — and for the specific and underrated advantage of finally knowing what you are asking for.
“We are not the same persons this year as last; nor are those we love. It is a happy chance if we, changing, continue to love a changed person.”W. Somerset Maugham The Painted Veil, 1925
Books
Three of these are practical and unsentimental, including forty years of laboratory research on what actually predicts a couple lasting. The novels are here because they show late desire without embarrassment: a widow knocking on a neighbour’s door, a difficult woman in her seventies, and one very funny account of the dating apps.
Ury is a behavioural scientist who worked at a dating app and then went and read the research, and the result is the least sentimental book here. She identifies the patterns that keep people single without their noticing, argues that most of us are terrible at predicting what will actually make us happy in a partner, and is very good on the second half of the problem: not finding somebody but deciding about them. Practical, and it works just as well at fifty-five as at twenty-five.
Addie Moore, a widow in her seventies, knocks on her neighbour’s door and asks whether he would consider sleeping in her bed at night, not for sex but for the company and the talking in the dark. Haruf wrote it while he was dying and it is under two hundred pages. It is the finest book there is about wanting somebody late, and about the grown-up children who take a dim view.
Page is a psychotherapist and his premise is that the qualities we are most ashamed of — being too intense, too sensitive, wanting too much — are the exact places where real connection is possible, and that most dating advice teaches people to hide precisely those things. His distinction between attractions of deprivation and attractions of inspiration is the most useful idea here for anyone who keeps ending up in the same situation with a different face.
Olive Kitteridge, widowed, difficult and in her mid-seventies, takes up with Jack Kennison and discovers that the awkwardness does not go away with age: the bodies, the previous marriages, the adult children, the fear of being seen. Strout is entirely unromantic and entirely warm at the same time, which is rare, and she writes late desire without a trace of embarrassment.
Perel’s subject is the tension between the security we want from a partner and the desire that requires a bit of distance to survive, and why the two keep undermining each other. It is aimed at long relationships and it is enormously useful before you start one, because it explains what actually went wrong last time in language that is not about blame. Read it before the third date, not after the third year.
Maggie is divorced at twenty-nine and insists, loudly and to everybody, that she is doing brilliantly. It is a comic novel and it is included here because the dating-app chapters are the funniest and most accurate anyone has yet written: the messages, the catastrophic first drinks, the compulsive checking. Younger than most readers of this page, and the mechanics are identical.
The Gottmans spent forty years watching couples in a laboratory and can predict divorce with unsettling accuracy, so when they set out eight conversations a couple should have — about money, trust, sex, family, growing older — it is worth taking seriously. Structured as eight actual dates with actual questions. Unglamorous, and exactly the right tool if you have decided you are not doing the second one the way you did the first.
Poems about midlife dating
A woman listing the questions she intends to ask before committing, a nymph declining a shepherd’s sales pitch, and a man announcing he is completely over it and immediately proving otherwise.
from “A Woman’s Question”
Adelaide Anne Procter, 1858
Procter was thirty-three and unmarried when she wrote this, and it is a list of questions a person asks the second time round rather than the first. Is there a link within the past that holds you still? Have you kept a portion back while I have staked the whole? Nobody at twenty-two asks these. Everybody who has done it once before, and paid for the things they did not ask, recognises them immediately.
“The Nymph’s Reply to the Shepherd” (extract)
Sir Walter Raleigh, 1600
Marlowe wrote a shepherd’s pitch promising beds of roses and a life of pastoral delight. Raleigh wrote the reply, and it is the funniest thing on this page: a woman who has heard the speech before, noticed that the flowers wither and the promises do not survive the winter, and would like to know what is on offer in February. Not cynical, exactly. Just fully informed, which is what dating at fifty tends to make a person.
“Since There’s No Help” (closing lines)
Michael Drayton, 1619
Drayton spends the first eight lines of the sonnet insisting, with great dignity, that he is completely over it and glad to shake hands and part. Then the last six give the game away entirely. It is here because it is the honest shape of most midlife dating: the declaration that you are finished with all that, followed almost immediately by the admission that you are not, and that one word from the right person would do it.
Quotes & Prose
Short lines for the hour before, and the taxi home afterwards.
Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Alain de Botton
The quality of your relationships determines the quality of your life.
Esther Perel
Have enough courage to trust love one more time and always one more time.
Maya Angelou
The advantage of dating later is that you have finally worked out what you are actually asking for. The disadvantage is that you now have to say it out loud to a stranger over a drink you did not really want.
Georgia Clare
From Georgia
A few short practices for the nerves, and for the question of what you actually want this time.
Embracing Your True Self
A guided practice for setting aside who you think you should be, and returning gently to the person you actually are — useful before you go out and try to describe yourself to somebody new.
Listen Now For Free
Fear or Intuition: Trusting Your Inner Yes
A short talk on telling fear from intuition, and learning to trust your own quiet yes, which is the whole difficulty of dating again.
Listen Now For Free
How to Let Go of the Past
On carrying what happened without letting it decide what happens next, which matters rather a lot when you are meeting somebody new.
Read the Essay →
Falling in Love Again After Heartbreak
On what nobody warns you about the second time round: that the hard part is not trusting another person, it is making room for them in a life you have rebuilt and come to love.
Read the Essay →
The 21-Day Meditation Course
Three weeks of short, guided meditations — steadying company for a stretch of life that involves a great deal of hope and a fair amount of disappointment.
Start the 21-Day Course →Questions people ask
Start with How to Not Die Alone by Logan Ury, which is behavioural science rather than romance and is very good on the patterns that keep people single without their noticing. If you want a novel instead, Our Souls at Night by Kent Haruf is under two hundred pages and is the loveliest book there is about wanting somebody late in life.
The mechanics are the same and almost nothing else is. You arrive with a history rather than a blank sheet, and so does everyone you meet: an ex, possibly children, a house, a body that has done some living, a clear idea of what you will not put up with again. That last part is the real advantage. Most of the difficulty is not finding people but tolerating the exposure of being seen honestly by a stranger at an age when you had assumed that was over.
Lines worth keeping include “Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition” (Alain de Botton), “The quality of your relationships determines the quality of your life” (Esther Perel) and “Have enough courage to trust love one more time and always one more time” (Maya Angelou). You will find these and others in the quotes section above.
By working out what actually went wrong, which is harder than it sounds and rarely the thing you tell people at parties. Esther Perel is useful here because she explains the mechanics without assigning blame, and the Gottmans give you eight specific conversations to have early rather than discovering the answers in year four. The pattern usually repeats when the diagnosis was never made, not when somebody was unlucky twice.